Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Elevate Money Guide
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-19 11:12:45
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (26)
Related
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- The Complicated Aftermath of Anne Heche's Death
- Earthquake measuring 4.3 rattles Parkfield, California Thursday afternoon
- 33 NFL training camp standout players you need to know in 2023
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Last of 6 men convicted in Wisconsin paper mill death granted parole
- Pink baby! Fan goes into labor at Boston concert, walks to hospital to give birth to boy
- What is hip-hop? An attempt to define the cultural phenomenon as it celebrates 50 years
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Family of Henrietta Lacks files new lawsuit over cells harvested without her consent
Ranking
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- 4th person charged in riverside brawl in Alabama that drew national attention
- Ford is losing a lot of money in electric cars — but CEO Jim Farley is charging ahead
- Prosecutors say a California judge charged in his wife’s killing had 47 weapons in his house
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- 'Burnt down to ashes': Families search for missing people in Maui as death count climbs
- Netherlands' Lineth Beerensteyn hopes USWNT's 'big mouths' learn from early World Cup exit
- Stock market today: Asian stocks decline after US inflation edges higher
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Kate Middleton and Prince William Get Special New Titles From King Charles III
LGBTQ+ people in Ethiopia blame attacks on their community on inciteful and lingering TikTok videos
Aaron Carter’s Twin Sister Angel Buries His Ashes
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
AP-Week in Pictures: Aug. 3 - Aug. 10, 2023
Ex-NFL player Buster Skrine arrested for $100k in fraud charges in Canada
Shop Aerie's 40% Off Leggings and Sports Bras Sale for All Your Activewear & Athleisure Needs